###
中国无机分析化学:2019,9(6):78-82
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
紫外法与红外法测定石油类的比对研究
(浙江省环境监测中心)
Comparative study on determination of petroleum by ultraviolet and infrared methods
(Zhejiang Environmental Monitoring Center)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 265次   下载 188
投稿时间:2019-03-01    修订日期:2019-04-09
中文摘要: 本文将新近实施用于测定地表水中石油类的紫外分光光度法与红外分光光度法的方法特性参数以及应用于各类实际水样测定进行了比对研究。实验结果表明,两种方法的检出限、测定下限、精密度和准确度等性能指标相近,但在应用于各种不同来源和组成水体的实际样品测定时,紫外法所得结果与红外法有明显的差异,表明该方法对较复杂水体石油类样品的测定存在局限性。
Abstract:In this paper, characteristic parameters of ultraviolet spectrophotometry and infrared spectrophotometry and their application to quantify petroleum in real water samples were compared. It is concluded that limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitativedetermination (LQD), relative standard deviation (RSD) and accuracy of two methods are similar. However, when it is applied to quantify petroleum in real water samples from different sources and water bodies, results obtaining by infrared spectrophotometry are obviously superior to those obtained by ultraviolet spectrophotometry, indicating that ultraviolet spectrophotometry has limitations in quantifying petroleum samples from relative complex water bodies.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:《钱塘江典型流域水环境中抗生素污染分布特征研究》(2016A011),浙江省环保科研项目。
引用文本:
吴嘉鹏,楼振纲,胡笑妍,史斌.紫外法与红外法测定石油类的比对研究[J].中国无机分析化学,2019,9(6):78-82.
Wu Jiapeng,Lou Zhengang,Hu Xiaoyan,Shi Bin.Comparative study on determination of petroleum by ultraviolet and infrared methods[J].Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry,2019,9(6):78-82.

我们一直在努力打
造,精品期刊,传
播学术成果

全国咨询服务热线
86-10-63299759

杂志信息

期刊简介

相关下载

联系我们

电话:010-63299759

传真:010-63299754

QQ:XXXXXXX

Email:zgwjfxhx@163.com

邮编:100160

地址:北京市南四环西路188号总部基地十八区23号楼

关注微信公众号