###
中国无机分析化学:2020,10(3):28-32
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)法与氢化物发生-原子吸收光谱(HG-AAS)法测定土壤中硒含量的对比研究
韩亚1, 郭伟1, 汪洪2
(1.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;2.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,农业农村部植物营养与肥料重点开放实验室/农业农村部农产品质量安全肥料源性因子风险评估实验室(北京))
Method Comparison for Determination of Selenium in Soil by ICP-MS and HG-AAS
Han Ya1, Guo Wei1, Wang Hong2
(1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;2.Institute of Agriculture Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/ The Laboratory of Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Risk Assessment from Fertilizer Sources (Beijing), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 82次   下载 54
投稿时间:2019-10-11    修订日期:2020-03-28
中文摘要: 基于氢化物发生器与原子吸收光谱联用(HG-AAS),测定土壤样品中硒的含量,并与电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)进行了对比。在两种仪器的最佳工作条件下,测定土壤硒的含量,实验结果表明:ICP-MS法和HG-AAS法对土壤硒含量测定的线性范围分别为0.85~100.00 μg/L和0.08~16.00 μg/L,检出限分别为0.25 μg/L和0.02 μg/L,精密度分别为1.34%和2.12%;用加标回收率试验和测定国家标准土壤样品(GSS-7)对这两种方法的准确性进行了验证,ICP-MS法和HG-AAS法的加标回收率分别为96.7~99.4%和94.9~99.5%,GSS-7标准土样的结果均在标准值范围内,说明这两种测定土壤中硒含量的方法是准确可靠的。HG-AAS法测定线性范围窄,部分样品需要稀释,而且氢化物发生系统是手动进样,导致操作复杂,分析周期长;ICP-MS法仪器测定快速,但是仪器昂贵。
Abstract:Based on hydride generator and atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS), selenium content in soil samples was determined and compared with inductively coupled plasma-mass pectrometry (ICP-MS). The selenium content of soil was determined under the best working conditions of the two instruments. The experimental results showed that the analytical calibration curves of selenium in soil were ranging from 0.85~100 μg/L for ICP-MS and 0.08~16 μg/L for HG-AAS, the detection limits were 0.25 μg/L and 0.02 μg/L, the precision of the two methods were 1.34% and 2.12%, respectively. The accuracy and reliability of the two methods were verified by recovery rates test and the results of the soil environment samples of certified reference materials (GSS-7). The recovery rates were 96.7~99.4% for ICP-MS and 94.9~99.5% for HG-AAS and the measure results of GSS-7 were in the range of standard values range, suggesting the two methods were accurate and reliable. Some samples have to be diluted due to the narrow linear range of HG-AAS, and the hydride generation system is needed manual injection, resulting in complex operation and longer determination period, while the assay of ICP-MS is rapid and expensive.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目,国家农产品质量安全风险评估项目,央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项
引用文本:
韩亚,郭伟,汪洪.电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)法与氢化物发生-原子吸收光谱(HG-AAS)法测定土壤中硒含量的对比研究[J].中国无机分析化学,2020,10(3):28-32.
Han Ya,Guo Wei,Wang Hong.Method Comparison for Determination of Selenium in Soil by ICP-MS and HG-AAS[J].Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry,2020,10(3):28-32.

我们一直在努力打
造,精品期刊,传
播学术成果

全国咨询服务热线
86-10-63299759

杂志信息

期刊简介

相关下载

联系我们

电话:010-63299759

传真:010-63299754

QQ:XXXXXXX

Email:zgwjfxhx@163.com

邮编:100160

地址:北京市南四环西路188号总部基地十八区23号楼

关注微信公众号