###
中国无机分析化学:2026,16(5):872-879
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
ICP-OES/ICP-MS 测定植物样品中铬、硒、钼含量方法比较
张元1,2, 谢旭1,2, 秦超1,2, 鹿传磊1,2, 晏福兴1,2, 刘意仁1,2, 谢潇3
(1.中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;2.自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站;3.武汉科技大学计算机科学与技术学院)
Comparison of Methods for Determining Chromium, Selenium and Molybdenum Contents in Plant Samples by ICP-OES/ICP-MS
zhangyuan1,2, xiexu1,2, qinchao1,2, luchuanlei1,2, yanfuxing1,2, liuyiren1,2, xiexiao3
(1.Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;2.Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources;3.School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 667次   下载 5
投稿时间:2025-11-07     修订日期:2025-12-08     录用日期:2025-12-17     网络发布日期:2026-05-06
中文摘要: 植物体内的Cr容易抑制植物生长、干扰植物生理反应,适量的Se可以增强植物的抗逆能力、提升产量,Mo在促进植物生长发育和增强植物抗逆能力发挥关键作用,植物体内Cr、Se、Mo含量对农产品营养价值评估、食品安全保障等具有重要意义。植物样品中有机质含量高、组成复杂,存在基体干扰。本文对比评估了干法灰化、湿法消解和微波消解三种样品前处理方法,比较了电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)的测定效果。同时引入相对碳浓度(RCC)小于13%作为消解效率的评价指标。通过对三种不同类型的生物成分分析标准物质测定进行验证,结果表明:干法灰化RCC小于13%,但是Se挥发严重、Cr容易受到污染。湿法消解部分样品RCC大于13%,需延长消解时间消除基体干扰,且耗酸量较大、空白高。微波消解RCC为10.1%~12.7%、有机物残留最少。ICP-MS比ICP-OES具有更高的准确度和更低的检出限。选择微波消解-ICP-MS测定Cr、Se、Mo,检出限分别为0.0067、0.0082、0.0038μg/g,准确度(RE)小于20%,相对标准偏差(RSD)小于10%,满足《生态地球化学评价样品分析技术要求(试行)》(DD2005-03)要求。与文献方法ICP-MS、ICP-OES、AFS检测结果差异不显著,通过实际样品验证,RCC指标实现消解效果的可量化评价,减少试剂用量与环境污染,为植物中元素测定提供了参考方法。
中文关键词: 植物样品        ICP-OES/ICP-MS  相对碳浓度(RCC)
Abstract:Chromium (Cr) in plants tends to inhibit plant growth and interfere with plant physiological processes. Appropriate amounts of selenium (Se) can enhance plant stress resistance and improve yield, while molybdenum (Mo) plays a key role in promoting plant growth and development and strengthening stress resistance. The contents of Cr, Se, and Mo in plants are of great significance for the evaluation of the nutritional value of agricultural products and food safety assurance. Plant samples are high in organic matter, complex in composition, and suffer from matrix interference. This study compared and evaluated three sample pretreatment methods: dry ashing, wet digestion, and microwave digestion, and compared the determination effects of inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Meanwhile, a relative carbon concentration (RCC) of less than 13% was introduced as an evaluation index for digestion efficiency. Validation through the determination of three different types of certified reference materials (CRMs) for biological composition analysis showed that: dry ashing achieved an RCC of less than 13%, but selenium volatilizes severely and chromium is prone to contamination. For wet digestion, the RCC of some samples exceeded 13%, requiring extended digestion time to eliminate matrix interference, along with a large amount of acid consumption and high blank values. Microwave digestion resulted in an RCC of 10.1%~12.7% with the least organic residue. ICP-MS exhibited higher accuracy and lower limits of detection (LOD) than ICP-OES. Microwave digestion combined with ICP-MS was selected for the determination of Cr, Se, and Mo, with LODs of 0.0067, 0.0082, and 0.0038 μg/g, respectively. The accuracy (relative error, RE) was less than 20%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was less than 10%, meeting the requirements ofSTechnical Requirements for Sample Analysis in Eco-Geochemical Assessment (Trial Implementation)S(DD2005-03). There was no significant difference between the detection results and those obtained by literature methods such as ICP-MS, ICP-OES, and atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS). Verified by actual samples, the RCC index realizes the quantifiable evaluation of digestion effects, reduces reagent consumption and environmental pollution, providing a reference method for the determination of elements in plants.
文章编号:     中图分类号:O657.31 O657.63    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学(52404350),全国金等战略性矿产实验测试技术支撑与服务(哈尔滨中心)(DD20250209110),辽宁省科技计划联合计划(2024-MSLH-492),中国地质调查局三级项目(DD20251131),自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室开放课题(2025KFKT006)
张元  谢旭  秦超  鹿传磊  晏福兴  刘意仁  谢潇
中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,中国地质调查局哈尔滨自然资源综合调查中心;自然资源部哈尔滨黑土地地球关键带野外科学观测研究站,武汉科技大学计算机科学与技术学院
zhangyuan  xiexu  qinchao  luchuanlei  yanfuxing  liuyiren  xiexiao
Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,Harbin Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center,China Geological Survey;Harbin Observation and Research Station of Earth Critical Zone in Black Soil, Ministry of Natural Resources,School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology
引用文本:
张元,谢旭,秦超,鹿传磊,晏福兴,刘意仁,谢潇.ICP-OES/ICP-MS 测定植物样品中铬、硒、钼含量方法比较[J].中国无机分析化学,2026,16(5):872-879.
zhangyuan,xiexu,qinchao,luchuanlei,yanfuxing,liuyiren,xiexiao.Comparison of Methods for Determining Chromium, Selenium and Molybdenum Contents in Plant Samples by ICP-OES/ICP-MS[J].Chinese Journal of Inorganic Analytical Chemistry,2026,16(5):872-879.

我们一直在努力打
造,精品期刊,传
播学术成果

全国咨询服务热线
86-10-63299759

杂志信息

期刊简介

联系我们

电话:010-63299759

传真:010-63299754

QQ:XXXXXXX

Email:zgwjfxhx@163.com

邮编:100160

地址:北京市南四环西路188号总部基地十八区23号楼

关注微信公众号